Farmers react to Producer Rice Mill pricing pool termination

What is in this article?:

  • Mill's pricing pool termination puts farmers in bad spot.
  • Amplifies young farmers' worries.
  • Arkansas Rice Growers Association leadership reacts.

More About:

Caught in the fallout of Producers Rice Mill’s Oct. 26 termination of its pricing pool, some farmer members of the co-op are reeling.

The mill’s move — which leadership says was prompted by “unprecedented” quality issues in the 2010 crop — has left them angry and fearful they’ll be short of money to pay off loans.

For more, see Pricing pool terminated and CEO explains milling concerns, actions.

“Let me tell you: this is a bad situation all around,” says producer Kenneth Graves, president of the Arkansas Rice Growers Association and a member of Producers. “I sympathize with farmers whose rice was affected by all the heat (during the summer) and that’s bad for the mills, too. Both sides have been hit.

“But the mill is taking care of the mill. The farmers are taking the brunt of this. Back in the day when farmers went with an LDP when rice was low, the mills made extra money by buying the low-priced rice. That (benefited) them. Now, when times are hard for the farmers, the mills are still being taken care of.”

Graves says farmers “are mad. They had to sign up acres with the co-op by the end of June. So, they committed ‘X’ number of acres.”

Largely based on those commitments, the co-op “markets a lot of the rice ahead of time and fills sales orders they need to. And if the farmers don’t bring the rice in, as promised, the co-op gets upset.”

Now, with the mill having taken members’ rice from the pricing pool and placed it in a seasonal pool, farmers “have lost control over their rice,” says Graves.

Another common complaint: even those with rice that milled well, or even decently, will also endure the expected financial hit to come.

“Depending on the variety, a lot of the rice is sampled and then co-mingled,” says Graves. “Well, if a farmer brings in bad rice and another brings in some good milling quality rice, it can all be dumped together. So, the farmers who had good milling rice can’t pull their crop from the bad. That puts the farmers with good rice in the same bad price boat — and many don’t think that’s fair.”

(For the mill's response to this, see Mill chairman explains pricing pool timeline, responds to rumors)

While there are no suggestions as to how the mill could keep from mixing loads, not everyone’s milling quality was terrible, agrees a veteran, east Arkansas rice farmer. “Everyone I’ve talked to said some of their rice didn’t mill well. But half, or more, milled okay. I even had some rice I got a milling premium on. Not all the milling was bad…

“Jerking farmers into the seasonal pool — not knowing what price you’ll get, or when — could be the straw that breaks the camel’s back in a lot of cases.”

According to the fine print of the mill’s membership documents, “they can (terminate the pool),” admits Graves. “But this is really going to hurt young farmers who have only been working fields for a year, or two. They’re trying to pay off initial loans, get in a financially solid situation and get their feet on the ground. This will hurt them badly.”

Indeed, the pool termination puts a spotlight on the financial tightrope too many vulnerable producers are perched on.

Discuss this article 3

Some thoughts:
1. At least when Riceland did this farmers haven’t already hauled their rice to the mill, leaving them hamstrung.
2. I don’t buy the argument that everyone should breathe a sigh of relief because the Seasonal Pool has beaten the USDA annual average. If I held myself to that standard I would have been out of business years ago. The real question is will PRM Seasonal Pool beat the roughly $5.40/bu the farmers could have gotten the day they killed the Pricing Pool. On top of that, the price better be significantly better due to interest charges on the delayed $2.50+/- in advances.
3. One of the articles mention the farmers that were part of the reason for the addition of the pricing pool, (the farmers that had on farm storage) were used to the self marketing option. Many of these farmers have rice in their on farm storage that is signed up to go to the PRM Pricing Pool. Why should these guys deliver on that agreement? Just because of some fine print the farmer in which they were unaware? Are farmers going to have to deliver or fear being blackballed from PRM? Or is PRM going to do the right thing and give those farmers a choice?

By Concerned (not verified)  on Nov 5, 2010

i think they have a way to cut the number of farmers who deliver rice to them which is probably the real goal. I've lost respect for the leadership from the board to the ceo who i once thought a lot of. all of my rice is still in the bin. when I've made a bad marketing choice I lived with it...

By Anonymous (not verified)  on Nov 6, 2010

When Riceland did this, the farmers in NE AR sold to anybody but Riceland and they did this before we hauled to them. I can only imagine how much business PRM will lose from this. Sometimes you gotta take a beating to maintain long term relationships. Doesn't sound like PRM is thinking long term

By Anonymous (not verified)  on Jul 20, 2011
Post new comment
Sign In or register to use your Delta Farm Press ID
(optional)

Continuing Education Courses
New Course

The 2,000-member Weed Science Society of America’s (WSSA) Herbicide Resistance...

Potassium nitrate has a positive effect in controlling plant pests and diseases when applied...
This online CE course details sound mechanical irrigation design and management practices to...
Farmer-to-Farmer Used Equipment