Rice varieties' carbon footprint

What is in this article?:

  • Lowering your carbon footprint typically “runs parallel with increasing economic profit. That’s really good news whether you’re a producer or an environmentalist.” says Lanier Nalley, agricultural economist with the University of Arkansas Division of Agriculture.
  • Nalley and Michael Popp, a fellow agricultural economist at the university, co-authored a study that “took a good Extension budget … and carbon foot-printed it. This is on conventional rice on silt loams in east Arkansas.”

More About:

When discussing agriculture alongside potential carbon markets and regulations, many assume it involves “an environmental fringe group and will never affect agriculture,” said Lanier Nalley, agricultural economist with the University of Arkansas Division of Agriculture. However, “it isn’t just environmentalists that care about carbon. We’ll all start caring about carbon in the near future.”

As an example of how mainstream carbon talk has become, Nalley said Wal-Mart is considering the introduction of a “sustainability index” with carbon as a part.

“Whether they go through with it, or not, is a different matter,” said Nalley at the recent Rice Research and Extension Center field day in Stuttgart, Ark. “Essentially, the index has three parts and they’ve sent it out to all their vendors.”

A question directly off the possible index: what is your total annual greenhouse gas emissions reported in the most recent year?

Wal-Mart is “asking vendors, ‘Are you taking a proactive role in measuring the greenhouse gas emissions you have? Have you set publicly available greenhouse gas reduction targets yet? If so, what are they?’

“So, this will probably affect us as an industry and will trickle down to producers.”

Wal-Mart might also ask vendors “if they are measuring water and how much they use. Again, that could affect the rice industry.”

The second part of the Wal-Mart sustainability index — and what Nalley is most concerned with as regards the rice industry — deals with “carbon footprinting.”

What Wal-Mart may want to do “is give their consumers an index … to allow consumers to make up their minds … what products to buy based on a series of environmental factors.”

Those factors could affect agriculture.

“Many businesses — Wal-Mart included — are attempting to obtain a ‘green’ advantage by marketing products as environmentally friendly.”

Starbucks, Nalley pointed out, “has all sorts of logos on their cups for all sorts of environmental groups: the panda bear representing the World Wildlife Foundation, a frog for the National Rainforest Alliance. This is a signal that there’s a consumer demand for this. Consumers are demanding more environmentally-friendly products.”

Discuss this article 1

I agree with Lanier Nalley and his approach to understand the affect of carbon sequestration and other ecoservice market may have on agricultural production systems. If farmers and farms can benefit both ecologically and economically from managing our resources differently, then we should probably at least look down this path so our young farmers can reap these opportunities.
By Tim Gieseke (not verified)  on Sep 22, 2010
Post new comment
Sign In or register to use your Delta Farm Press ID
(optional)

Continuing Education Courses
New Course

The 2,000-member Weed Science Society of America’s (WSSA) Herbicide Resistance...

Potassium nitrate has a positive effect in controlling plant pests and diseases when applied...
This online CE course details sound mechanical irrigation design and management practices to...
Farmer-to-Farmer Used Equipment