Obama budget riles farm groups

May 11, 2009 11:33 AM, By Forrest Laws
Farm Press Editorial Staff

The Obama administration is continuing to push for a $500,000 cap on direct payments, a new limit on total farm program payments and elimination of cotton storage credits in its budget proposals for fiscal year 2010.

Although the House and Senate budget committees rejected the proposals in their fiscal 2010 budget resolution Congress passed in April, administration officials again called for the reductions in the formal unveiling of its 2010 budget requests on May 6.

The latest request calls for Congress to eliminate direct payments to farmers with gross sales in excess of $500,000. That could mean a cotton producer with more than 870 acres of cotton would no longer be eligible for direct payments, according to budgets compiled by land-grant universities.

The administration plan also would retain the $40,000 per person limit on direct payments and the $65,000 limit on counter-cyclical payments in the 2008 farm bill and institute a new $145,000 limit on marketing loan gains. (The 2008 law places no cap on loan deficiency payments or marketing loan gains.)

“As part of an effort to transition large farms from direct payments provided to owners of base acres to increased income derived from emerging markets for environmental services, the budget phases out direct payments over three years to farmers with sales revenue of more than $500,000 annually,” a USDA fact sheet said.

Large farmers are “well positioned to replace payments with alternate sources of income from emerging markets for environmental services, such as carbon sequestration, renewable energy production, and providing clean air, clean water and wildlife habitat.”

Farm groups said they would continue to argue against the administration’s attempt to change the direction of farm programs.

“Since February, USA Rice Federation has led and will continue to lead commodity coalition opposition to changing the 2008 farm bill that Congress approved and paid for last June,” said USA Rice Federation Chairman Jamie Warshaw.

“Congress’ recently-adopted 2010 budget resolution does not require farm bill changes,” Warshaw said. “USA Rice will urge Congress to uphold that decision by not opening the farm bill during its 2010 appropriations debate.”

Besides the changes in the amount of farm program payments, the administration proposals would also reduce the premium subsidies for federal crop insurance coverage by 5 percentage points for all coverage levels.

Cotton producers also would no longer receive help with payments for keeping cotton in approved government warehouses while it is being held in the Commodity Credit Corp. loan, a change that could result in more cotton coming on the market and further reducing prices.

Conservation groups, which are said to be commanding more influence in the new administration, gave a thumbs up to administration requests for increased funding for rural economic development and farm credit programs in the 2010 fiscal year.

But the National Sustainable Agriculture Coalition criticized administration plans to reduce conservation program spending by $680 million from the mandatory funding baseline for the 2008 farm bill and redirect the savings to other programs.

“This is unacceptable,” said Ferd Hoefner, policy director for the NSAC. “We strongly oppose the singling out of the conservation title of the farm bill for cuts and urge Congress to reject the president’s proposal.”

The conservation cuts would include $250 million from the Environmental Quality Incentives Program, $43 million from the Wildlife Habitat Incentives Program, $30 million from the Farm and Ranchland Protection Program and $350 million from the Wetlands Reserve Program.

The Conservation Stewardship Program, Grassland Reserve Program, Conservation Reserve Program and other smaller programs were left unchanged. On the fiscal year 2009 agricultural appropriations, Congress left all the farm bill conservation programs intact with the exception of a $270 million cut in EQIP.

The savings in farm programs are part of the administration’s efforts to trim $17 billion from the federal budget for fiscal year 2010, which begins Oct. 1. Total federal spending is expected to exceed $3.4 trillion due to spending for federal bailout programs and the economic stimulus package along with the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan.

e-mail: flaws@farmpress.com

Get Copyright ClearanceWant to use this article? Click here for options!
© 2009 Penton Media, Inc.


Latest Jobs

Read More Daily News

WTO awards Brazil retaliation authority

Nov 20, 2009 11:01 AM

The World Trade Organization has authorized Brazil to seek retaliation against the United States for it support of two U.S. commodity programs....

Precision ag – online course

Nov 20, 2009 10:53 AM

University of Missouri Extension is offering an eight-week online course on managing farm machinery using precision agriculture, Jan. 12 through March 4....

Soybeans — U.S. key export supplier

Nov 20, 2009 10:48 AM

Weather problems are now thought to be factored into market prices. ...

$485 million loss – Mississippi

Nov 19, 2009 3:57 PM

Mississippi State University agricultural economists calculate Mississippi farmers are suffering an estimated $485 million value loss in 2009. ...

Biofuels goal beyond ethanol

Nov 19, 2009 10:05 AM

If the U.S. is to reach the government-mandated target of producing 36 billion gallons of biofuels annually by 2022, “We will need to change the way we do business,” says a USDA official....

Delta Farm Press News
Southeast Farm Press News
Southwest Farm Press News
Western Farm Press News

resources

events icon events

product info icon tradeshows

tradeshow icon digests

research icon photos

Continuing Education


(New Course)
Weed Resistance Management in Cotton

This course covers a wide range of options to effectively control weeds in cotton and reduce the risk of weed resistance management. It is accredited for hours/units for licensed/accredited applicators in 7 U.S. Cotton Belt states (Florida, Georgia, New Mexico, Oklahoma, Texas, South Carolina an d Tennessee. CCA credit is pending).

This course is accredited in Texas, Oklahoma, New Mexico, Virginia, West Virginia and Wyoming as well as for CCA credits:

(New Course)
Spray Drift Management

Keeping crop protection chemicals on the crop for which they are intended has been a cornerstone of farming not only to protect neighboring crops, but to not waste money allowing products to drift off the intended target. This accredited online continuing education course covers the critical elements of spray drift management.

Back to Top

Browse Print Issues

Additional Resources

subscribe to Farm Press Daily Southeast Farm Press Southwest Farm Press Western Farm Press