ASA board wants checkoff program investigated
Dec 10, 2008 9:52 AM
“In the best interest of U.S. soybean farmers,” the board of directors of the American Soybean Association has voted unanimously to ask the secretary of agriculture to order an investigation and financial audit of the National Soybean Checkoff Program.
The ASA petition, filed with Agriculture Secretary Ed Schafer and the inspector general of the USDA, calls for an investigation of the United Soybean Board (USB) and the U.S. Soybean Export Council (USSEC) “to ensure that soybean checkoff dollars are being managed and invested as prescribed by law.”
“Serious ethical, legal, and financial allegations have been raised about how farmer checkoff funds and program activities are being conducted,” said ASA President John Hoffman, a soybean producer from Waterloo, Iowa. “These significant allegations have caused ASA to ask the inspector general to conduct an investigation and audit so the basis of the allegations can be impartially investigated to find the truth.”
Allegations include the improper and wasteful expenditure of both checkoff and federal funds; potential evasion of mandated salary and administrative spending caps by USB; conflicts of interests at USB; use of checkoff funds for prohibited purposes by USB; and wasteful and excessive spending by USB.
There are additional allegations concerning improper USB oversight and tolerance of actions that have taken place at the USSEC, an entity created by USB and ASA in October 2005. These allegations include improper conduct by a USSEC employee at USSEC functions; the firing of whistleblowers; improper employee relationships; contracting violations; management malfeasance and the inability of ASA directors serving on USSEC board to obtain an independent and objective investigation of the allegations.
“With USB and USSEC, we are dealing with entities that are spending tens of millions per year in soybean farmer checkoff dollars and U.S. taxpayer funds,” Hoffman said. “As the policy organization that represents U.S. soybean farmers, it is ASA’s responsibility to ensure the soybean checkoff, and other entities the checkoff has created, are operating in an accountable and transparent manner in the best interest of soybean farmers.”
ASA is the only national, non-governmental, non-profit trade organization that represents soybean farmers in the United States. It was ASA and its state affiliates that developed the concept for a national soybean checkoff in the late 1980s and then worked with Congress and USDA to establish the national soybean checkoff in 1990.
“ASA and its members believe that since federal taxpayer funds or the federally mandated checkoff funds comprise all of the operations of USB and USSEC, we are compelled to petition for an OIG investigation to ensure these allegations are examined in an unbiased and fair way, something that ASA has tried to do within the framework of USB and USSEC, but has been thwarted in so doing by USB directors and their attorneys,” Hoffman said.
“ASA firmly believes it is doing the right thing for soybean farmers by asking the inspector general to conduct a full investigation of the serious allegations of wrongdoing that have surfaced,” Hoffman said.
“ASA believes the national soybean checkoff, as currently structured and operated, is no longer responsive and accountable to soybean farmers. The failure of USB leaders to take decisive action on these particular matters is indicative of how USB is no longer accountable and responsive to the very soybean farmers who are paying funds into the checkoff program.”
Soybean checkoff funds are invested in program areas such as domestic and international marketing, new uses development, production research and producer communications.
During the national checkoff’s nearly two decades of operation, soybean farmers have paid $1.3 billion into the checkoff. At the higher price and acreage levels experienced recently, checkoff collections from soybean farmers in fiscal 2008 are estimated to exceed $140 million — three and half times the amount collected in 1992 when the national checkoff first began.
The ASA board of directors approved calling for an inspector general investigation at the board’s regularly scheduled winter meetings, which began Dec. 9 in Saint Louis.
During the meeting, board members reviewed allegations of improper activities that have surfaced and voted unanimously to take action in the best interest of U.S. soybean farmers. ASA has shared a summary of its concerns and allegations with state and national soybean leaders and key industry stakeholders. The summary document is also available at www.soygrowers.com/newsroom/releases/documents/summary.pdf.
“ASA does not take this action lightly but with great reluctance,” Hoffman said. “ASA must do what is in the best interest of soybean farmers ethically, legally, and financially. ASA believes strongly in the need for a national soybean checkoff program — but one that is accountable, transparent and responsive to soybean farmers, and spends their dollars wisely. Over the coming months, ASA will begin announcing specific steps it will take to ensure the national soybean checkoff is accountable to soybean producers and spends their money prudently.”
