Food inflation blame game

Feb 13, 2009 8:04 AM, By Hembree Brandon
Farm Press Editorial Staff

Every six months or so, as I drive along the main drag pre-dawn, the siren call of dough deep-fried in artery-clogging fats and coated with sugar reaches out to ensnare me, and ever so guiltily I wheel in for a couple of glazed donuts.

For the longest time, the tab was one buck — 50 cents each. Today, it was $1.20, a 20 percent increase (there was not, alas, a corresponding increase in the size of the donuts).

Now granted, a 20-cent boost in the price of two donuts spread over the six months between cravings ain’t a budget-buster. But while I was conditioned to automatically forking over a dollar bill for my biannual lapse into sinfulness, in a transaction that was neat and even, now I’ll have to cough up another 20 cents … and that just may be the added psychological restraint that keeps me on the wagon.

I’m sure the donut seller could cite the huge increase in the cost of flour and other inputs as justification for the price hike, a microcosmic representation of what the U.S. food consumer has been confronted with at every turn for the past couple of years — price escalation seemingly of a magnitude equivalent to the oil/energy sector.

Everything from Oreos to chicken to broccoli to bacon either saw significant price increases or less product in the package (i.e., 12 ounces of bacon as a “pound”) or both.

Food prices at the nation’s grocery stores rose by a whopping 6.6 percent in 2008, according to the Department of Labor (baked goods and cereals led the list, up 11.7 percent). It was the largest increase in nearly 30 years, coming on top of a 5.6 percent increase in 2007. By contrast, the 2006 increase was 1.4 percent.

Big Food was quick to attribute the increase to higher energy costs in all the steps along the pipeline from farm to supermarket shelf; record or near-record prices for corn, wheat, rice, and soybeans; and the government-mandated increase in ethanol production and usage.

But while they were spending millions on PR and lobbying campaigns in an attempt to portray ethanol and higher crop prices as villains, they were racking up quarterly profit increases of 37 percent, 61 percent, 72 percent, etc.

The CEO of one major food company noted that “in 2008, we made progress in several important areas, most notably pricing.” Another reported that higher retail food prices “have so far helped keep (our) profits safe from the higher costs” of commodities/inputs.

So, though their costs were indeed increasing, they were able not only to insulate themselves by raising the prices for their products, they were able to rack up substantial profits in the process.

Interestingly, while oil prices have fallen precipitously in the wake of the global financial meltdown, and major commodity prices are significantly below year-ago levels, supermarket food prices have not declined.

Some industry analysts expect food sector inflation to ease somewhat this year — but that won’t do anything to offset the ongoing impact of the 12.2 percent increase consumers have been hit with the past two years.

e-mail: hbrandon@farmpress.com

Get Copyright ClearanceWant to use this article? Click here for options!
© 2010 Penton Media, Inc.


Latest Jobs

Read More Daily News

Eminent domain for private development?

Mar 19, 2010 11:09 AM

Mississippi is one of only eight states that haven’t passed eminent domain reform legislation that would prevent the taking of private property for commercial development....

Soybeans: foreign supply pressure

Mar 19, 2010 10:42 AM

Soybeans: Bearish news: Soybeans remain in a downtrend. Sell on the rallies because the market must go lower as South American supplies become available....

Trade interests harming U.S. health?

Mar 19, 2010 10:33 AM

U.S. trade interests are putting trade concerns over the health and safety of American consumers by delaying a seafood inspection law passed by Congress 21 months ago, the Catfish Farmers of America has charged....

Neck blast of rice is back

Mar 18, 2010 10:53 AM

The 2009 rice growing season in Arkansas was the wettest year on record for many reporting stations in the state, according to the National Weather Service. ...

Soil residuals… have a backup plan?

Mar 18, 2010 10:48 AM

In my last column I ended on the topic of “whole farm” weed control and resistance management. ...

Delta Farm Press News
Southeast Farm Press News
Southwest Farm Press News
Western Farm Press News

resources

events icon events

product info icon tradeshows

tradeshow icon digests

research icon photos

Continuing Education


(New Course)
Weed Resistance Management in Cotton

This course covers a wide range of options to effectively control weeds in cotton and reduce the risk of weed resistance management. It is accredited for hours/units for licensed/accredited applicators in 7 U.S. Cotton Belt states (Florida, Georgia, New Mexico, Oklahoma, Texas, South Carolina an d Tennessee. CCA credit is pending).

This course is accredited in Texas, Oklahoma, New Mexico, Virginia, West Virginia and Wyoming as well as for CCA credits:

(New Course)
Spray Drift Management

Keeping crop protection chemicals on the crop for which they are intended has been a cornerstone of farming not only to protect neighboring crops, but to not waste money allowing products to drift off the intended target. This accredited online continuing education course covers the critical elements of spray drift management.

Back to Top

Browse Print Issues

Additional Resources

subscribe to Farm Press Daily Southeast Farm Press Southwest Farm Press Western Farm Press