ASR rides into Tennessee, after beans left town

Oct 22, 2007 10:45 AM, By Elton Robinson
Farm Press Editorial Staff

Asian soybean rust rode wind and wet weather across Arkansas and Mississippi in mid-September and into west Tennessee farm fields in October, looking for a victim for its deadly spores. Fortunately, most of the region’s soybean crop had already left town.

BY THE time Asian soybean rust arrived in the north Delta this season, most of the soybean crop was beyond damage from the disease. In the south Delta, the disease arrived earlier than ever before, but fungicide sprays were very successful in stopping it. In many areas of the Mid-South, soybean yields have been golden.

According to the University of Tennessee, Asian soybean rust was found in west Tennessee on soybean leaf samples collected from a field plot in Gibson County, Oct. 3, at the University of Tennessee Milan Research and Education Center.

UT Extension staff monitored for rust in soybean sentinel plots and spore traps across the state all summer and had not found any rust lesions on soybean leaves until the October discovery. The disease samples — a few rust pustules — were found on soybean leaves and visually identified with a microscope at the UT Extension lab at Jackson.

The samples were then tested by Melvin Newman, Extension plant pathologist in Jackson. The leaves are undergoing final confirmation that the pustules are Asian soybean rust by polymerase chain reaction testing in Knoxville.

Newman speculates that the lack of rain in west Tennessee during critical times in the growing season prevented soybean rust from developing earlier. “Several rain fronts passed by west Tennessee, but they developed and caused rain west of the Mississippi River. This may be why soybean rust was found in eastern Arkansas in late September while none was found in Tennessee until last week.”

The disease came too late to cause any damage to crops, according to UT Extension plant pathologist Beth Long. “Most soybean plants in Tennessee have been harvested and very little green leaf tissue remains in the field.”

The same holds true for soybeans in Arkansas and Mississippi. In Louisiana, the disease came earlier than ever before, but growers kept it under control.

According to Louisiana Extension soybean specialist David Lanclos, “The big story was that the disease occurred 53 days earlier than it did in 2006. Because of that we had a lot more observations in the field.”

Ironically, the disease had one positive impact — the threat of rust caused other diseases to be scouted for more efficiently, he said. “This is probably why we’re setting yield records in Louisiana for two years in a row.”

Ground zero for rust in Louisiana occurred around Cheneyville, La., according to Lanclos, “where we had the initial spore shower. Overall, we’ve had rust in the majority of our fields, especially on our later-planted soybeans. But from a loss perspective there was nothing major.”

A big concern for Lanclos is the effect of current high wheat prices on the state’s double-cropped soybean acres in 2008. Louisiana is expected to plant about 400,000 acres of wheat this fall in response to high prices, up from 220,000 acres in 2006.

After harvest, 90 percent of these wheat acres will likely be planted in soybeans, and these crops are likely to be exposed to more incidences of rust. “Research coming out of LSU indicates that we need to plant an early-maturing soybean, a late Group 4 or early Group 5,” Lanclos said. “This would limit our exposure to Asian soybean rust as we go through the season.”

Lanclos cautioned growers against a false sense of security if they did not follow a recommendation to spray a field, and those beans subsequently did not develop the disease.

“Just because we made a recommendation to spray doesn’t mean you’ve had a spore shower in your area. Our recommendation means it’s in the area, and it’s enough of a concern to spray. But it doesn’t guarantee that each field is going to have rust. Next year, there could be rust in those fields.”

While west Tennessee’s soybean crop dodged a bullet with soybean rust, it dodged quite a bit of rainfall, too. Soybeans generally rank among the state’s top crops, earning farmers approximately $278 million in cash receipts in 2006. Due to the drought, yields are down from 39 bushels per harvested acre in 2006 to estimates of just 24 bushels per acre this year.

The Tennessee Agricultural Statistics Service reported in September that production for 2007 is expected to fall by 57 percent from last year’s 44 million bushels to just 25.2 million bushels.

At this time there are no commercial soybean varieties resistant to soybean rust. Fungicide applications can reduce yield losses from rust and other late-season diseases, depending on the plants’ developmental stage, the time during the growing season when soybean rust is detected and weather conditions.

Asian soybean rust is caused by the fungal species Phakopsora pachyrhizi and is known to infect kudzu and many other legume species. It has the potential to significantly reduce soybean yields but can be managed with the use of fungicides if detected early.

In addition to the west Tennessee site, Asian soybean rust has been found in 15 states in 169 counties; in 18 counties in Alabama (13 soybean), 33 counties in Arkansas (all soybean), 16 counties in Florida (eight soybean), 14 counties in Georgia (10 soybean), one county in Illinois (soybean), one in Iowa, four counties in Kansas (soybean), two counties in Kentucky (soybean), 15 parishes in Louisiana (14 soybean), 15 counties in Mississippi (12 soybean), four counties in Missouri (soybean); two counties in Nebraska (soybean); 11 counties in Oklahoma (all soybean), seven counties in South Carolina (soybean) and 26 counties in Texas (25 soybean).

More information about soybean rust and recommended measures for controlling the disease are available through the UT Extension Web site: http://UTcrops.com. First click on “soybean” then follow the link labeled “diseases and nematodes.” Growers can also visit the USDA soybean rust Web site: http://www.sbrusa.net/ and view the map showing positive locations.

e-mail: erobinson@farmpress.com

Get Copyright ClearanceWant to use this article? Click here for options!
© 2010 Penton Media, Inc.


Latest Jobs

Read More Daily News

Tillage tests — ‘trash farm for profit’

Feb 9, 2010 9:47 AM

As he speaks, Merle Anders has a small prop on the table behind him: a baseball cap inscribed with “Trash Farming for Profit.” ...

Reduced-till and cotton seedling diseases

Feb 9, 2010 9:43 AM

Managing no-till or reduced-till cotton production properly, including following appropriate planting recommendations and taking care of early weed problems, may reduce potential for disease outbreaks....

Chicken litter — ‘smell of success’

Feb 9, 2010 9:33 AM

Having used poultry litter on his family’s Jonesboro, Ark.-area farm for years, Wayne Wiggins III is a proponent of the practice. ...

NCC: 10.1 million cotton acres

Feb 8, 2010 10:30 AM

After three straight years of declines, U.S. cotton acreage could be headed back up, according to the National Cotton Council’s 27th annual Early Season Planting Intentions Survey....

Weed resistance, Washington headline Farm & Gin Show

Feb 8, 2010 10:24 AM

This year’s Mid-South Farm and Gin Show offers “perhaps the best set of exhibits ever,” says Tim Price, manager of the annual event to be held Feb. 26-27 at the downtown Memphis Cook Convention Center....

Delta Farm Press News
Southeast Farm Press News
Southwest Farm Press News
Western Farm Press News

resources

events icon events

product info icon tradeshows

tradeshow icon digests

research icon photos

Continuing Education


(New Course)
Weed Resistance Management in Cotton

This course covers a wide range of options to effectively control weeds in cotton and reduce the risk of weed resistance management. It is accredited for hours/units for licensed/accredited applicators in 7 U.S. Cotton Belt states (Florida, Georgia, New Mexico, Oklahoma, Texas, South Carolina an d Tennessee. CCA credit is pending).

This course is accredited in Texas, Oklahoma, New Mexico, Virginia, West Virginia and Wyoming as well as for CCA credits:

(New Course)
Spray Drift Management

Keeping crop protection chemicals on the crop for which they are intended has been a cornerstone of farming not only to protect neighboring crops, but to not waste money allowing products to drift off the intended target. This accredited online continuing education course covers the critical elements of spray drift management.

Back to Top

Browse Print Issues

Additional Resources

subscribe to Farm Press Daily Southeast Farm Press Southwest Farm Press Western Farm Press