Economics of fungicide seed treatment for soybeans

Mar 7, 2006 9:04 AM, By Larry Heatherly

Fungicide seed treatment for soybeans has been thought necessary ever since the soybean production system in the Mid-South changed from traditional May and later plantings to early soybean planting systems. Ensuring against stand failure in early plantings has been thought to be worth the cost of seed treatment even though proving yield increases and greater net returns has been difficult.

Finally, there is proof that treating soybean seeds before planting provides increased economic return. A study conducted in Arkansas and published in the Agronomy Journal by senior author Paul Poag and his colleagues is the first to provide results that place an economic worth on fungicide seed treatment.

According to sources cited in their report, soybean seedling diseases in Arkansas caused an estimated loss of $32.4 million in 2003. Also, they state that there is no feasible instrument to economically test for the presence of seed and seedling pathogens, or to predict resulting yield losses at time of planting. That is why it has been difficult to objectively prove the worth of fungicide seed treatments for soybeans.

The data for their study were obtained from experiments conducted at Stuttgart and Keiser over a three-year period. They used high- and low-quality seeds planted at high and low seeding rates in April, May, and June.

To ensure that conditions were conducive to pathogen development, they applied simulated rainfall when seedlings were emerging.

They used contact, systemic, and contact plus systemic combination fungicides applied to seeds before planting to compare their effect to untreated seeds. Since the cost of the different seed treatments used in their study was relatively minor (<$2 per acre for product) compared to other production costs, the economic impact of the different seed treatments was mainly driven by yield differences.

Their results are striking. According to their analyses, profitability was increased by an average of nearly $18 per acre when high-quality seeds were treated with a systemic fungicide (<$3.50 per acre cost for pretreated seed). This finding was true across locations, planting month, and soil moisture conditions.

Their data revealed another important point. Using high-quality rather than low-quality seeds when both were properly treated increased producer returns by an average of over $26 per acre. When low-quality seeds were used, a seed treatment product containing both systemic and contact fungicides was sometimes superior.

Another conclusion can be drawn from their results, based on the following two points.

First, the cost difference between the systemic fungicide and the product containing both contact and systemic fungicides used in their study was only 27 cents per 50 pounds of seed. (Similar cost differences exist today.)

Second, the use of a product with both systemic and contact fungicides was sometimes necessary to achieve the best results in their study. Therefore, since the cost difference between a systemic product and a combination product is small, it makes economic sense for producers to use one of the myriad products that contain both systemic and contact materials to ensure the best possible results from the application of fungicides to soybean seeds for planting.

My next column will provide a list of combination products that are labeled for soybean seeds.

Larry G. Heatherly is a retired USDA-ARS research agronomist and current crop consultant. e-mail larryheatherly@bellsouth.net

Get Copyright ClearanceWant to use this article? Click here for options!
© 2009 Penton Media, Inc.


Latest Jobs

Read More Daily News

WTO awards Brazil retaliation authority

Nov 20, 2009 11:01 AM

The World Trade Organization has authorized Brazil to seek retaliation against the United States for it support of two U.S. commodity programs....

Precision ag – online course

Nov 20, 2009 10:53 AM

University of Missouri Extension is offering an eight-week online course on managing farm machinery using precision agriculture, Jan. 12 through March 4....

Soybeans — U.S. key export supplier

Nov 20, 2009 10:48 AM

Weather problems are now thought to be factored into market prices. ...

$485 million loss – Mississippi

Nov 19, 2009 3:57 PM

Mississippi State University agricultural economists calculate Mississippi farmers are suffering an estimated $485 million value loss in 2009. ...

Biofuels goal beyond ethanol

Nov 19, 2009 10:05 AM

If the U.S. is to reach the government-mandated target of producing 36 billion gallons of biofuels annually by 2022, “We will need to change the way we do business,” says a USDA official....

Delta Farm Press News
Southeast Farm Press News
Southwest Farm Press News
Western Farm Press News

resources

events icon events

product info icon tradeshows

tradeshow icon digests

research icon photos

Continuing Education


(New Course)
Weed Resistance Management in Cotton

This course covers a wide range of options to effectively control weeds in cotton and reduce the risk of weed resistance management. It is accredited for hours/units for licensed/accredited applicators in 7 U.S. Cotton Belt states (Florida, Georgia, New Mexico, Oklahoma, Texas, South Carolina an d Tennessee. CCA credit is pending).

This course is accredited in Texas, Oklahoma, New Mexico, Virginia, West Virginia and Wyoming as well as for CCA credits:

(New Course)
Spray Drift Management

Keeping crop protection chemicals on the crop for which they are intended has been a cornerstone of farming not only to protect neighboring crops, but to not waste money allowing products to drift off the intended target. This accredited online continuing education course covers the critical elements of spray drift management.

Back to Top

Continuing Education


(New Course)
Weed Resistance Management in Cotton

This course covers a wide range of options to effectively control weeds in cotton and reduce the risk of weed resistance management. It is accredited for hours/units for licensed/accredited applicators in 7 U.S. Cotton Belt states (Florida, Georgia, New Mexico, Oklahoma, Texas, South Carolina an d Tennessee. CCA credit is pending).

This course is accredited in Texas, Oklahoma, New Mexico, Virginia, West Virginia and Wyoming as well as for CCA credits:

(New Course)
Spray Drift Management

Keeping crop protection chemicals on the crop for which they are intended has been a cornerstone of farming not only to protect neighboring crops, but to not waste money allowing products to drift off the intended target. This accredited online continuing education course covers the critical elements of spray drift management.

Browse Print Issues

Additional Resources

subscribe to Farm Press Daily Southeast Farm Press Southwest Farm Press Western Farm Press