USDA implements provisions to protect livestock and poultry producers

  • USDA publishes Final Rule implementing the 2008 farm bill provisions to better protect livestock producers and poultry growers under the Grain Inspection, Packers and Stockyards Administration (GIPSA).

The USDA has published the Final Rule implementing the 2008 farm bill provisions to better protect livestock producers and poultry growers under the Grain Inspection, Packers and Stockyards Administration (GIPSA).

"As I travel throughout the countryside, I often hear from farmers and ranchers about their concerns with the marketplace becoming more concentrated," Agriculture Secretary Tom Vilsack said. "While concentration certainly comes with some efficiencies, Congress recognized in the 2008 farm bill that additional protections for producers are warranted. Today's rule will implement these targeted protections and help provide more fairness and transparency in the marketplace."

The provisions being finalized by the USDA were required by the 2008 farm bill and have been modified from the June 22, 2010 proposed rule. These sections include criteria the Secretary may consider when determining whether a live poultry dealer has provided reasonable notice to poultry growers of any suspension of the delivery of birds, when determining whether a requirement of additional capital investments over the life of a poultry growing arrangement or swine production contract constitutes a violation of the Packers and Stockyards Act and when determining if a packer, swine contractor, or live poultry dealer has provided a reasonable period of time for a grower to remedy a breach of contract that could lead to termination of a production contract.

The rule also includes a section requiring contracts that require the use of arbitration to include language on the signature page that allows the producer or grower to decline arbitration and provides criteria the Secretary may consider when determining if the arbitration process provided in a contract provides a meaningful opportunity for growers and producers to participate fully in the arbitration process.

The USDA also planned to seek additional public comment on several other revised provisions from the June 22, 2010 proposed rule including changes to the tournament system of payment for poultry growers, requirements to collect and post sample contracts and to address the issue of need for producers to show harm to competition prior to asserting a violation of the Packer and Stockyards Act. However, the FY2012 Agriculture Appropriations bill passed by Congress included language prohibiting the USDA from moving forward on these important provisions.

Discuss this article 2

These rules are a step in the right direction but what is not in the final rules compared to the proposed rules is what is disheartening.

We have the meat packer crybabies saying that these rules will cost them up to 55 million dollars per year.

That is a huge admission to the amount of damage they are imposing on family farmers to give them an edge in out competing more honest players in the business.

The new rules fall short of ideal.

Basically the Congress did a deal that would be equivalent to allowing Bernie Madoff a free pass on all his past frauds and limit his current frauds to $50,000 per poultry supplier before they are held accountable.

No wonder our Congress is held in such low regard. They take what amounts to trifling amounts of bribe money from people like the meat packers to sell out the family farmers to the tune of 55 million dollars per year.

With policies like this, our economy is sold to the lowest common denominator with little or no remedy to those who ave been cheated out of the value of their property.

It is another political capitulation to the crony elements of our capitalism and slap in the face to holding the rich and powerful accountable.

Tom

By TomT (not verified)  on Dec 10, 2011

These rules are the equivalent to telling Bernie Madoff that all his past frauds

are forgiven and he has a $50,0000 limit per person fraud in the future (with a

bunch of loopholes to avoid that limit).

Personally, I think the 50,000 is an automatic industry give away. If this

was the starting point of whether economic holdup could happen, then the

companies automatically have a 50,000 free be on the farmer's dime. I

personally could care less what "upgrades" these companies came up with to be

competitive in the market place. My problem was they were MAKING their family

farmer "partners" pay for these costs and not giving them the rewards from the

market. In essence all of these family farmers become an automatic lender to

these giant corporations who use it to extract value from the growers and put

the benefits in their column of either advancement with respect to their

competitors or pocket profits. Did Bernie Madoff have a $50,000 freebee with

his investors? Does each stock broker have $50,000 worth of fraud they can

commit per person before they are held accountable?

By Anonymous (not verified)  on Dec 12, 2011
Post new comment
Sign In or register to use your Delta Farm Press ID
(optional)

Continuing Education Courses
New Course

The 2,000-member Weed Science Society of America’s (WSSA) Herbicide Resistance...

Potassium nitrate has a positive effect in controlling plant pests and diseases when applied...
This online CE course details sound mechanical irrigation design and management practices to...
Farmer-to-Farmer Used Equipment