What is in this article?:
- Farm bill and sequestration impacting conservation programs
- Sequestration cuts
- NRCS Chief Jason Weller makes two-day stop in Arkansas.
- Tours projects, meets with those in NRCS programs.
- Promotes new farm bill, explains impacts of sequester cuts.
NEW NRCS CHIEF Jason Weller, right, toured Arkansas in late August. At a stop outside Marianna, he heard about hoop house technical assistance from Julius Hancock, farm manager for the University of Arkansas-Pine Bluff Farms.
Farm and nutrition programs are often at the forefront of debate over a new farm bill. But conservation programs are also a vital part of the farm bill mix.
In late August, the USDA's Natural Resources Conservation Service (NRCS) Chief Jason Weller visited Arkansas for the first time. While in the state, Weller – who has been in his current position since July -- toured NRCS projects and met with those working with the service.
During an Aug. 29 stop at the University of Arkansas-Pine Bluff’s Agriculture Demonstration and Outreach Center outside Marianna, Weller spoke with Farm Press about the NRCS mission, the need for a new farm bill and the toll sequester cuts have taken. Among his comments:
What is at stake in terms of conservation if a new farm bill doesn’t pass?
“The farm bill is crucial for an array of things: whether nutrition programs where people need some support, the Women Infant Children program, the SNAP program, crop insurance or farm support programs.
“If you look at the whole package, the farm bill is crucial. And it isn’t just for rural America. There are urban Americans who really depend on the benefits from that bill.
“But it’s also about conservation. Conservation is, of course, about the wise management of resources -- water, soil. And that’s great.
“But what I’m here to highlight and what’s so important is that (NRCS programs) also are investments in families, in businesses. They help families stay afloat through hard times like in droughts, weather events, changing market forces, through climate change. They help them be as productive as possible, year to year.”
More on those investments…
“These investments are helping us be as efficient as possible with water use. If they’re getting water on the crops and not over-irrigating, that protects surface and groundwater resources.
“They’re also helping them to be as efficient as possible with nutrients. If we can keep from over-applying nutrients, it means more money is saved and nutrients aren’t flushed out in rains.
“The programs help with energy efficiency. By converting to more efficient use of diesel engine pumps, electric irrigation, poultry houses having better insulation – all across the board, NRCS has expertise that can really help producers be as productive as possible. And that isn’t just aimed at being productive just in the next few years, but far into the future.
“We want family operations to stay in operation and be able to know that their soil and water resources will allow them to grow production and be successful in years to come.”
On the ‘follow-on’ effect…
“Beyond conservation, though, are the things that are being highlighted in the meetings today. While the NRCS helps individual producers be more productive and successful, there is also a follow-on economic effect.
“For example, I met with a producer this morning, Harvey Williams, who has a 280-acre operation growing many crops. He employs around 18 folks and those jobs are an economic benefit to the community. He then sells to organizations that employ others who shell, package and market the produce.
“So, conservation can be the catalyst but the follow-up echoes throughout the rural economy. Ultimately, the food produced is nutritious and safe for those shopping at Wal-Mart, the local grocery store, the farmers’ market.
“Conservation isn’t a ‘nice’ thing to have. It’s an essential thing to have.”