Corps: Missouri levee 'decision point' at hand (UPDATED)

Missouri Farm Bureau opposed to blowing levee
  • Corps monitoring river levels, options for flood control.
  • Is considering blowing two-mile section of southeast Missouri levee to alleviate flooding concerns in Cairo, Illinois.
  • Move would flood some 140,000 acres of bootheel farmland.
  • Missouri Farm Bureau opposed to deliberately breaching levee.

The Army Corps of Engineers is continuing to weigh a decision on whether to go ahead with plans to detonate pipe in a levee in the Missouri Bootheel and flood nearly 140,000 acres of farmland.

That comes as the Mississippi River continues to rise from rain dumped by yet another storm system that has been sweeping across the South. Latest reports say 173 persons -- most of them in Alabama and Mississippi -- have been killed in tornadoes spawned by the huge line of storms that began in Texas and were expected to hit North Carolina this morning. 

The decision about the levee at Birds Point in Southeast Missouri is not without controversy.  Missouri farm leaders believe the flooding resulting from opening the levee could permanently damage the farm land. That message was echoed in a letter sent by a trio of Missouri legislators to President Obama on Wednesday.

For more, see Missouri legislators write Obama on levee plan.

A late Wednesday morning report claimed the Army Corps of Engineers would wait at least until the weekend to make a decision on blowing a two-mile section of levee near Bird’s Point. If the levee is blown, it would relieve flooding fears in Cairo, Illinois, at the confluence of the Mississippi and Ohio rivers. However, it would also mean evacuations and allowing some 140,000 acres of prime Missouri crop acreage to go underwater.

For more, see Corps to blow southeast Missouri levee to relieve surging river? 

Reached at noon on Wednesday, Jim Pogue, the Corps’ Public Affairs Specialist for the Memphis District, said the wait-until-the-weekend claim “is not really correct. Let me tell you where we are.

“The equipment barges are headed north.

“The next decision point will take place this afternoon. That decision point is: do we continue to wait and watch or do we go ahead and prepare the levee for possible detonation? It will be this afternoon before any more decisions are made.

“Right now, we’re moving forward prudently and cautiously and making sure we’re in the right place on this fluid timeline. (That way) if we have to take the next steps, we’re ready to do it.”

When will the barges (which contain equipment and explosives that will be needed if the levee is blown) reach the target area?

“They’ll be pushing up to this general area. The intention is to pre-position in the area and wait – that should be sometime tonight.”

'Irreversible damage'

In an early afternoon interview, Blake Hurst, Missouri Farm Bureau president, said worried Bootheel farmers began calling his office on Monday.

“We’re opposed to blowing the levee,” said Hurst. “We’re concerned about the damage to the farm ground and the danger from all the stuff that will wash down the river.

“Running that much water through that many acres, we’re worried about the damage it would do permanently to the farm ground. That holds not only for this year’s crop, of course, but (into the future). It would leave behind sand deposits and trash. Diesel tanks, propane tanks and anhydrous tanks would wash away.

“It’s already a huge natural disaster. I hope we don’t make it worse."

Kevin Mainord, a producer and mayor of a town located on the edge of the floodway, said farmers started moving equipment out of the floodway Monday. “Probably 80 percent of the farming equipment is out, and all that is left are a few homeowners who need to move their possessions. Some homeowners are moving their possessions out but will stay at their residences until it’s evident that the levee will be either overtopped or degraded by the Corps.”

Mainord says the region contains a diversified crop mix of corn, grain sorghum, rice and soybeans. He farms 5,200 acres within the spillway on both the river side of the levee and in the spillway.

Mainord says that if the floodway is opened, as much as a third of the farmland in the area would not be farmed again. “A lot of the drainage would be filled with sand and sediment. It would take years to recover. It’s ridiculous during this time and age that we would be sacrificed to save someone else.

Continue fight

“Even though we know the Corps has the authority and has had an operational plan in place since 1937, it’s our hope as farmers, landowners, residents of the county and of the spillway, that we do not want them to artificially degrade the levee, or let it naturally overtop is there if a way to fight it.”

Mainord is also the mayor of the town of East Prairie, Mo. The town is just outside the spillway and is protected by a levee, but Mainord is concerned about having water right at the town’s doorstep. “Once they release the water, we would be at the mercy of whatever comes through the river.”

Hurst, too, worries about unforeseen consequences if the levee is opened. "Clearly we’d like (the Corps) to flood-fight as long as they possibly can before making a decision" regarding the levee.

Has Farm Bureau crunched the numbers to see what revenue could be lost on the 140,000 acres?

“Just consider corn at the current price,” said Hurst. “You’re looking at a loss of around $150 million in a year just in crop revenues.

“The Corps has made it clear they don’t want to do this. I take them at their word. I’m sure it would be an absolute, last alternative. I just hope they do everything else possible first.”

Compensation

If the levee is blown will there be compensation for the farmers?

“We’ve been asking that question," said Hurst. "It’s Farm Bureau’s position that they should be compensated for both crop losses and damage to structures. (The resulting flood) would scour the ground and deposit huge amounts of sand. Farm structures, grain bins would all go. So, we hope there would be compensation.

“There has been concerns that crop insurance won’t cover it because it would be a ‘man-made occurrence.’ … However, they should all be covered. The flood isn’t man-made – it’s a natural disaster. Crop insurance should kick in.”

Affected farmers are facing a horrible situation, said Hurst. “It’s just awful. Yesterday, a Corps spokesman said ‘we’re seeing history being made.’ That’s true and isn’t something we’d wish on anyone – but he’s right, this is historic.”

Missouri Gov. Jay Nixon, said the plan to take down the levee “could cause significant damage, for families and the towns that would be washed away, but for future generations.

“Blowing up the levee system that was designed and built over decades is a very dramatic and dangerous action, with the potential to literally change the way the Mississippi River floods and flows. We’re going to make sure that we fight for what has been a very useful farmland, a very safe place with levees that have worked for decades.”

Discuss this article 9

Think for a minute what you are saying. Bird Point has been in operation since 1930's. No one asked farmers to come in there and start farming, especially knowing this could happen. The Corp is only doing their job. Lives over Land. Sorry, but my chose is Lives, and so should yours. Cario, Ill. deserves your sympathy. Land can be cleared. Its happened over and over again from years ago, and can happen again.
That is what Bird Point is about...if the floods came there would be a relief valve, you just happen to be in the way of that relief. Sorry the truth hurts sometimes, but we are talking about peoples lives.

By Anonymous (not verified)  on Apr 28, 2011

I live in Mo. and your not doing the people right in CAIRO save the town and flood the CROPS

By Anonymous (not verified)  on Apr 29, 2011

why don't they move the 2800 people out of Cairo,Ill. Oh, let's make it about people's lives who are not going to move . Their Mayor has asked them to move, some have, most haven't. However, Missouri Farmers were told to move and take all of their equipment and personal things too. It seems to me that 2800 squealing people who moved to a flood plain should have no more rights than u give farmers. Well well, apparently u think food comes from stores and not from farms. If this ground is flooded to the extent they think( u can't stop the water once u blow a mile wide hole in the levee, it will encompass much more than they think.) This is a man made catastrophe in the making,, This will ruin the ground for 50 years, let alone ruin more than 90 homes and 200 peoples lives. I guess u forget about those 200 people.

By Anonymous (not verified)  on Apr 30, 2011

As I understand, the people that moved into the Missouri farmland in question also knew that it was a floodplain and designated spillway that could be used in situations such as these.

Cairo is under a mandatory evac order that went into effect at midnight. The town is under control of National Guard and local emergency personnel. Although there may be a few people that refuse to leave (as there are in the Missouri spillway), there are not 2800 squealing people who refuse to leave. Everyone in these two (and many other river communities) are in potential danger--this is about more than Missouri vs Cairo. Kentucky and Tennessee stood alongside Illinois in the legal fight so that their river communities could be spared as well.

I grew up in Cairo and still have family and many friends there. My heart goes out to everyone that faces any losses during this time but, as I told my father, possessions can be replaced, life cannot. We only hope that all those that refuse to leave these areas will be safe.

By Anonymous (not verified)  on May 1, 2011

One question to ask, Crop Insurance and Flood Insurance, will damage caused by intentional flooding by blowing levees..be covered in full? Those damaged by any intentional flooding should be compensated in full--and not like the US government did in Gulf of Mexico after the oil spill with lines of litigants, forced to take pennies on the dollar. Flood and Crop insurance should be required to cover the damage up to the liability limits. Those without insurance who were not in the "flood zone:-and get flooded because of government actions - need to be given retro active coverage. Unfortunately, any errors in the Corp Of Engineers plan to blow the levee..could have major impacts on many peoples lives. Before causing further damage, the Corp needs to guarrentee victims will be covered by insurances, and receive aid to insure full recovery of their lands in the future. Don't we depend on our farmers and agiculture to provide biofuel? Lets not let "for the good of many--destroy entirely the few." And yes, it is US taxpayers again --paying for damages.

By Anonymous (not verified)  on May 1, 2011

Oh, and there is the fact that the farmers sold the flood rights. They've already been financially compensated. Oh, and it's not just Cairo at stake here either. But most of S.E. MO, southern IL, and western KY. And many hundreds of thousands more farmland than that in the flood way. And there is the fact that people were told not to build on the flood way, as well.

By Anonymous (not verified)  on May 1, 2011

Let me get this straight. Ya'll want to flood over 140,000 acres of prime farm ground, destroy farm and rural families lives and properties, destroy East Praire, Missouri, and countless other problems associated with this plan including scouring the ground so that even though trash can be cleared away at great expense, there won't be any topsoil left to grow anything. All to save WHAT ???? CAIRO, ILLINOIS ????? HAVE YOU BEEN TO CAIRO??? DO YOU KNOW WHAT CAIRO IS ???? And ya'll want to save that by destroying hard working Southern Missouri citizens ???? Where ya'll from ?? Let me guess, Illinois ?? or some northern city ??? Ya'll make me sick to my stomach.

By Anonymous (not verified)  on May 2, 2011

The corps 1930's project is now Way out of date. Yes it allowed farmland to be flooded. But there were Thousands of acres that had yet to be farmed in the US. Today there isn't! And we have become dependant of the acerage. That all we have left! Urban sprawl taking away so much of Prime Acerage and now the chance of ruining the farmland? Just isn't Financially. economically viable> Not to mention what might happen in the future if the land is ruined!

By Anonymous (not verified)  on May 3, 2011

I am an agri-science instructor who would naturally side with the farmers on this. However,neither the farmland in question OR Cairo,Illinois would even be in use or inhabited were it not for the continued maintenance and expense of the levee system. It is a floodway that these people chose to farm in and a floodplain that others chose to live in-the Corps is following existing law. Move Cairo ,Illinois and let people take a chance on farming the rest-but if you believe our food supply is important enough then support continued maintenance of the levee system for agricultural use.BUT don't allow people to continue to LIVE in a known floodplain.

By Anonymous (not verified)  on May 11, 2011
Post new comment
Sign In or register to use your Delta Farm Press ID
(optional)

Continuing Education Courses
New Course

The 2,000-member Weed Science Society of America’s (WSSA) Herbicide Resistance...

Potassium nitrate has a positive effect in controlling plant pests and diseases when applied...
This online CE course details sound mechanical irrigation design and management practices to...
Farmer-to-Farmer Used Equipment