Agriculture facing major changes in child labor laws

‘Sweeping’ changes proposed, family farm exemptions untouched

What is in this article?:

  • New 'sweeping' rules to govern child labor in agriculture proposed.
  • Children of farmers working family operations remain exempted.

 

Long in the works, the U.S. Department of Labor (DOL) is set to release proposed updates to child labor regulations aimed at safety concerns in agriculture-related jobs.

DOL officials -- who claim the fatality rate for teenagers working in agriculture is four times greater than the risk for the average working teenager -- say the proposals will not impact current exemptions for children of farmers working on family operations.

For more see Farm worker woes and updating child labor laws.

Exemptions for such children are "legislative and nothing in (these new regulations) would disturb that particular legislative provision,” said Michael Hancock, DOL Assistant Administrator for Policy, during a Wednesday afternoon press conference.

For other farm-working youths, however, the proposed rules – which have not been updated since the 1970 Fair Labor Standards Act – would add new restrictions and flat-out bans. Among them:

  • Strengthening of current child labor regulations prohibiting agricultural work with animals and in pesticide handling, timber operations, manure pits and storage bins.
  • Prohibition of youths at country grain elevators, grain bins, silos, feed lots, stockyards, livestock exchanges and livestock auctions.

During the work-up of the new rules “It became apparent there were hazards in grain bins and other enclosed spaces where children were working both on farms and off,” said Hancock. “There have been a number of fairly high-profile incidents involving children through engulfment or other tragic injuries and accidents. So, we saw this as an opportunity to also propose rules for grain bins and other such structures.”

Prompted by later questions, Hancock said the new rules “would essentially preclude kids under 18 from being on the premises of a commercial grain elevator.” While previous regulations attempted to address such situations “there was never any broad, sweeping prohibition on kids working in a grain elevator. It had to be specific -- like working with an augur or lift. We’ve concluded in grain elevators there are too many hazards and kids shouldn’t be present in that work place.”

  • Prohibition of those under age 16 from participating in the cultivation, harvesting and curing of tobacco.
  • Prohibition of youth in both agricultural and nonagricultural employment from using electronic, including communication, devices while operating power-driven equipment.

“’Distracted driving’,” said Hancock, “was becoming a major issue that the Department of Transportation and DOL were interested in trying to address. We thought this was an opportunity to propose a regulation that affects not (only) children working on farms but also children employed in non-agricultural occupations.

“We thought it was worth the time and effort to pull the rule back and add additional provisions dealing with distracted driving.”

  • Prohibition of those under 16 years old from operating almost all power-driven equipment. A limited exemption would permit some student learners to operate certain farm implements and tractors, when equipped with proper rollover protection structures and seat belts, under specified conditions.

Hancock: “There are a number different changes and additions that deal with farm equipment generally – whether tractors or other power-driven machinery that we’ve concluded present an unacceptable risk to children.

In the proposed rules “we’ve identified a number of very specific implements in the work place that present an unnecessary and unacceptable risk to children. In most cases, they’ll be precluded from working around those implements.

“There is a small window that still exists for children in a legitimate training/student learner program. That will allow them, under close supervision and after sufficient training, to continue to work with things like tractors.”

According to a DOL press release, it is also proposing to create “a new nonagricultural hazardous occupations order that would prevent children under 18 from being employed in the storing, marketing and transporting of farm product raw materials.”

Discuss this article 11

What the hell more regulation from bais untrained surveyors. How else do you install work ethic? The reason threr are more deaths is like anything else, their the only ones with any drive and now you want them to become couch potatoes. Term limits and less regulation. KISS

By Anonymous (not verified)  on Nov 3, 2011

We are working on our third generation of people who never had to work because the government gives them an income for doing NOTHING! Our children need to understand what hard work will give you; money in their pocket, and a sense of accomplishment for a job well done. When is this nonsense going to end? In small agricultural communitys, these are the only jobs our teenagers can have. However, in these small towns we have more and more people moving in due to low rent, who do not want jobs because then they won't receive there "paycheck" from Uncle Sam. These are becoming the majority in our community and I do not want my son to EVER think that this is the way to live in society. Earn your keep, work hard and live within your means. It's really that simple.

By Anonymous (not verified)  on Nov 30, 2011

Wow, as a parent of a son who works for a farmer part time may I say less regulations please. Our son paid for his first truck,laptop, ect.by running a tiller,harvesting,putting up fence post. He did it on his own and has learned to have pride in a job well done. He gets great joy from the pies or salad made from the fruits and veggie he brings into our home. My spouse and I have three sons hard work never hurt any of them.Today parents are suppose to give children whatever thier little hearts desire. We disagree when a child or teen works for what they want it has more value to them, they choose wisely because it is from thier own toils, sweat,and hard work. Our sons do not ask for bail outs, they look for ways to make the money they need.Our sons are all grown now the youngest mentions above just turned 18, three years of farm work was great for him. Also proud to say in a 'there are noooo jobs' whiny world all three are employed. TCB sons!

By Anonymous (not verified)  on Nov 30, 2011

If congress and the Obama Administration would take the time to realize that Agriculture is America's backbone - maybe such laws wouldn't come into perspective for change. We family farmers, agriculturalist, FFA and 4-H members (new and old), do what we do because we love this industry and believe in American Agrilculture. Perhaps take time to read the FFA creed and ask a young agriculturist if they think these new laws will be of benifit. Also, what is this teaching the younger generation? More and more kids are lacking a sense of hard work and determination as other things seem to consume their lives...the young agriculturalist who these laws are focusing on, are the ones that know the meaning behind hard work and see the benefits from doing so! If we're restricting them from learning and practicing the trade of "farm life," how will they ever know how to reap the benefits in the future? "I beleive that to live and work on a good farm, or to be engaged in other agricultural pursuits, is pleasant as well as challenging - for I know the joys and discomforts of agricultural life, and hold and inborn fondness for those associations which even in hours of discouragement, I cannot deny" (a portion of the FFA creed, written by E.M Tiffany). We've seen hard times and good, and felt the blow of discouragement. Remember, Congress - these kids your talking about, do what they do because they want to! It's a way of life which teaches us so much!

By Anonymous (not verified)  on Dec 1, 2011

Well said! My own 12 yr. daughter knew immediately how it would impact FFA and 4-H kids along with the kids who participate in youth rodeo events. These kids DO have a great work ethic that the "city kids" have no chance to reflect upon, and unfortunately, do not respect. Thank you for standing up for our Ag Kids!

By Anonymous (not verified)  on Jan 8, 2012

To have a law which prohibits kids from working on farms is rediculous given the need in this country for technically trained people in the coming years. My experience as a semi-retired design engineer is that a farm provides the BEST broad learning environment for any future technically trained individuals. While in college many decades ago, an engineering professor commented "I can pick out the farm kids immediately, they are head & shoulders above the others." I observed the same thing throughout my career, as "farm kids" always walked into any situation displaying a significantly broader knowledge backgound than the "non-farm kids" . Yes, a farm environment has dangers, but it's what starts the preparation for the inherent dangers in any career working with high voltage electronics, chemicals, construction, high pressure hydraulics, etc. etc. Do not legislate stupidity!!!

By Anonymous (not verified)  on Dec 3, 2011

Despite the fact that my 12 year old daughter has been to two funerals of a younger friend that died in an agricultural related death, that does not stop her from carrying on the ranching traditions of riding, sorting, branding, cleaning up after, and caring for the variety of ranch animals we have. It has indeed cautioned her. But like you said, these kids will have a better outlook on the safety issues, concerns, and general common sense of any job position given to them. I have heard over and over that a businessman would rather hire a "farm kid" because of their work ethics. Prohibiting these kids from learning the values of a good day's work, usually at a parent's side, would definately impact agriculture in the very near future. People of this country NEED to understand that their food, and subsiquent by-products come from farms and ranches, not the store!

By Rancher Mom (not verified)  on Jan 8, 2012

You guys are all right...children should work, forego an education, not be subject to labor protection and not contribute to social security and medicare that will ultimately help them. I don't know about you, but I like labor rights and why should the poor (face it, farm workers at mostly poor) not be subject to protection. The American public will pay a few cents more for their food.

By Anonymous (not verified)  on Jan 14, 2012

My son at the age of 6 found a way to work with farm animals at the local livestock commission. He told me that Mondays (the day he worked) were better than the weekend. He is now 8 and unemployed - but most of all heart broken and wondering why he can't continue to work doing what he loved most. He has a work ethic I wish the middle school students I teach had. Do we really need to legislate away the jobs that kids were learning a strong work ethic in?

By Anonymous (not verified)  on Jan 16, 2012

I a "farm kid" have grown up on a farm my entire life. This law is ridiculous! The first time I drove a tractor I was 6, the first time I tilled a field, raked the hay, stacked hay on the wagon I was 12! I am a very hard working child and I have good working ethics. I take care of a 450 head dairy farm with a breeding stock. I am a 16 year old girl now! If these laws go passed I would be lost. I would have nothing in my life anymore. My passion for my farm life and job is all I know. Im inheridting the family farm when it come time. Being in FFA and having my SAE being my 450 head dairy cattle and my breeding stock with my fields of foliage.

By Anonymous (not verified)  on Jan 16, 2012

I am an FFA member, and this is what I believe:

I believe in the future of agriculture, with a faith born not of words but of deeds - achievements won by the present and past generations of agriculturists; in the promise of better days through better ways, even as the better things we now enjoy have come to us from the struggles of former years.

I believe that to live and work on a good farm, or to be engaged in other agricultural pursuits, is pleasant as well as challenging; for I know the joys and discomforts of agricultural life and hold an inborn fondness for those associations which, even in hours of discouragement, I cannot deny.

I believe in leadership from ourselves and respect from others. I believe in my own ability to work efficiently and think clearly, with such knowledge and skill as I can secure, and in the ability of progressive agriculturists to serve our own and the public interest in producing and marketing the product of our toil.

I believe in less dependence on begging and more power in bargaining; in the life abundant and enough honest wealth to help make it so--for others as well as myself; in less need for charity and more of it when needed; in being happy myself and playing square with those whose happiness depends upon me.

I believe that American agriculture can and will hold true to the best traditions of our national life and that I can exert an influence in my home and community which will stand solid for my part in that inspiring task.

The creed was written by E. M. Tiffany

By Anonymous (not verified)  on Jan 29, 2012
Post new comment
Sign In or register to use your Delta Farm Press ID
(optional)

Continuing Education Courses
Potassium nitrate has a positive effect in controlling plant pests and diseases when applied...
This online CE course details sound mechanical irrigation design and management practices to...
Keeping crop protection chemicals on the crop for which they are intended has been a...