GPS — phosphorus in cotton

Nov 4, 2009 11:10 AM, By Elton Robinson, Farm Press Editorial Staff

Unlike nitrogen, phosphorus is highly immobile in soils, and subject to various transformations, depending on the chemical environment.

Use of RTK guidance systems not only helps farmers plant straighter rows and eliminate guess rows — it’s also allowing University of Arizona researchers gather precision information to help cotton producers reduce phosphorus (P) rates, do a better job of taking advantage of residual P and increase lint yields.

GPS WITH sub-meter accuracy not only allows for precise injection of phosphorus fertilizer under the seed line by a modified Telone injector, but it also allows researchers studying residual P levels to soil sample the area under the band year after year.

According to research, about 11 pounds of P is needed for every bale of cotton produced. The soil does have some supplying power for P, but many Arizona growers have to apply supplemental P due to high pH soils.

Unlike nitrogen, phosphorus is highly immobile in soils, and subject to various transformations, depending on the chemical environment.

Randy Norton, soil scientist at the Safford Agricultural Center, Safford, Ariz., noted, “On the high pH soils of Arizona, calcium and magnesium can take P out of solution and make it unavailable to the plant. Phosphorus is most available to the plant at a pH range of between 5.0 and 6.0. Most soil pH in Arizona can be as high as 8.5.”

To increase soil availability of P for cotton producers, soil scientists suggest placing it as close to the root zone as possible, concentrating the P in a band.

“Basically, we want to minimize soil contact with the P,” Norton says. “We do not recommend broadcast applications because you’re maximizing the soil contact.”

While timing for P applications is not nearly as critical as it is for nitrogen application due to P’s immobility, Norton says the best time to apply it is early “so that it’s there for proper root development.”

A 15-year Arizona study conducted by Norton, Jeff Silvertooth, agronomist at the University of Arizona, and others on cotton yield response to P showed that at soil test levels below 5 parts per million there is a good chance for a positive response to a P application. The likelihood of a positive response to a P application decreases above 5 parts per million.

A current study conducted by researchers on the high pH soils of the Safford Valley in the upper Gila River Valley, is looking to take research on banded P a step further, with the help of GPS technology.

Growers in the Safford Valley began to invest in GPS guidance systems in 2003, primarily for help in constructing straighter and more uniforms rows.

Recently, rising fertilizer prices have prompted researchers and growers to explore more efficient methods of P placement using GPS. The price of diammonium phosphate started to increase significantly in January 2007, reaching $1,200 per ton in the summer of 2008, before starting to fall.

GPS systems with real-time kinematic (RTK) differential, or sub-inch accuracy, allows growers “to put up rows, inject fertilizer directly under the row and then plant the seed right on top of the row, to within sub-inch accuracy year after year.”


Acceptable Use Policy
blog comments powered by Disqus

Get Copyright ClearanceWant to use this article? Click here for options!
© 2009 Penton Media, Inc.


Latest Jobs

resources

events icon events

product info icon tradeshows

tradeshow icon digests

research icon photos

Continuing Education


(New Course)
Weed Resistance Management in Cotton

This course covers a wide range of options to effectively control weeds in cotton and reduce the risk of weed resistance management. It is accredited for hours/units for licensed/accredited applicators in 7 U.S. Cotton Belt states (Florida, Georgia, New Mexico, Oklahoma, Texas, South Carolina an d Tennessee. CCA credit is pending).

This course is accredited in Texas, Oklahoma, New Mexico, Virginia, West Virginia and Wyoming as well as for CCA credits:

(New Course)
Spray Drift Management

Keeping crop protection chemicals on the crop for which they are intended has been a cornerstone of farming not only to protect neighboring crops, but to not waste money allowing products to drift off the intended target. This accredited online continuing education course covers the critical elements of spray drift management.

Back to Top

Browse Print Issues

Additional Resources

subscribe to Farm Press Daily Southeast Farm Press Southwest Farm Press Western Farm Press