Farm Press Blog

U.S. energy independence by 2020? Uhh, haven’t we heard this before?

RSS

When seeking public office — especially the highest in the land — candidates can promise anything. Too often, post-election, those promises are conveniently relegated to obscurity, or the new president quickly finds that, no matter how well-intentioned, he can personally do little to effect major change. Such has been the case, nigh on to 40 years, for energy independence.

 

“I know … that talk can be cheap. You can say anything.” No truer words have been uttered by a politician than these by presidential candidate Mitt Romney.

When seeking public office — especially the highest in the land — candidates can promise anything. Too often, post-election, those promises are conveniently relegated to obscurity, or the new president quickly finds that, no matter how well-intentioned, he can personally do little to effect major change.

Oh, maybe a Supreme Court appointment here, a war launched there, but when it comes to history-making accomplishment, well, there’s that obstreperous group called Congress, which may or may not cooperate, not to mention worldwide economic/market forces that can toss a monkey wrench into things.

But hey, why worry about realities when hustling votes? Promise ‘em anything, baby — just get me elected.

Back to Candidate Romney, whose “cheap talk” quote was followed by an outright fairy tale: “By the end of my second term, I make this commitment: We will have North American energy independence. We won’t have to buy oil from Venezuela and the Middle East. We’re gonna be independent.”

Anyone halfway grounded in reality knows that, barring an alien spaceship landing on the White House lawn and handing over technology for limitless energy, it just ain’t gonna happen.

Absent Armageddon in the Mideast, tankers in 2020 will still be schlepping oil westward to the U.S., this country will in all likelihood be consuming more oil/gasoline/diesel than ever — and most certainly paying more for it.

Yes, the U.S. will doubtless be producing more of its own energy, whether oil, natural gas, coal, nuclear, solar/wind, biofuels. But as we’ve seen for decades, usage pretty much equates to production — and usage is still predominantly for transportation that is primarily petroleum based.

U.S. oil production is at an eight-year high, and in 2011 we cut oil/petroleum imports by 1 million barrels per day (while shipping millions of gallons of petroleum products to the highest bidders overseas). Stricter fuel economy standards are slowly but surely increasing efficiency of cars/trucks.

But our energy appetite is voracious — and Mideast oil is, for the foreseeable future, the easiest way to feed that hunger.

Every president, all the way back to Richard Nixon, has promised to get the U.S. in position to tell OPEC to stuff it.Hear an outraged Nixon following the 1970s Arab oil embargo that brought the country almost to a standstill: “Let this be our national goal: At the end of this decade, in the year 1980, the United States will not be dependent on any other country for the energy we need.”

Didn’t happen. Ditto for Ford, Carter, Reagan, Bush 1, Clinton, and Bush 2. We just used more and more.

Most recently, in 2008, then Senator Barack Obama made a campaign promise that, if elected president, he’d end U.S. imports of Mideast oil within a decade. With almost four years of that decade gone, that pledge, too, is more fairy tale than reality.

Discuss this Blog Entry 2

on Aug 24, 2012

I would at least like to try for energy independence. Wind and solar aren't going to cut it, for at the near term. If we want to do something, lets start another Manhatten style project and look at hydrogen or something else. I don't see the logic in ethanol. People are starving around the world and food prices are spiking and we're using it for fuel. Unless something has changed, you can't ship it through a pipeline and it is horrible on engines, especially small engines. We have an abundance of oil and gas in the US and we play around at getting it. I understand the argument about anything we get ends up in the world market. I would open up the public lands for exploration, however I would stipulate that it is for our use only. It could only be sold on the open market if we have more than a one year reserve. The oil and gas obtained from private lands is free to be sold on the open market. I would increase the number of refineries to double or triple the number we have now.

Dan (not verified)
on Aug 25, 2012

Point taken: Maybe that's why we would be miserable failures as politicians. What's really scary are some of the proposals made by candidates that you would be afraid that, if elected, they would actually do it.

Please or Register to post comments.

What's Farm Press Blog?

The Farm Press Daily Blog

Connect With Us

Blog Archive
Continuing Education
Potassium nitrate has a positive effect in controlling plant pests and diseases when applied...
This online CE course details sound mechanical irrigation design and management practices to...