Farm Press Blog

Consumer Reports’ Boogeyman of the Month


Is arsenic in rice really a danger, as Consumer Reports says, or is their study just another boogeyman invented to scare people?

There is not a federally established standard for acceptable levels of arsenic in food, but that didn't stop Consumer Reports from saying the levels they found were worrisome, and suggesting that consumers cut back on their rice consumption.

This is what we know about Consumer Reports’ just unveiled Boogeyman of the Month.

It is efficient. A teaspoon deftly delivered in a spot of tea will take you out on the spot. In miniscule amounts, it has been linked to cancer.

It’s everywhere – in the air, water and soil. In the 19th century, it was used as medicine and today, as a wood preservative and as a pesticide. Ten to 20 milligrams of total arsenic exists in our bodies at any given time. In fact, it’s the 12th most common element in the human body.

It’s also in food in varying amounts measured in micrograms (1 millionth of a gram). In very nutritious food at that, like apple juice and grape juice.

And for that, it got the attention of Consumer Reports.

If you haven’t guessed by the now, Consumer Reports’ latest scare tactic is arsenic in rice. According to its study, its inorganic form appears in rice at levels that are “worrisome.”

How they came to this conclusion is puzzling as there is no current standard for acceptable levels of arsenic in food. The Food and Drug Administration is working on it, and should have some data we can sink our teeth into by the end of the year.

This lack of information, however, did not stop Consumer Reports from not only divining what it considered to be worrisome levels, but concluding that consumers should cut back on rice consumption.

The closest thing to a standard is an Environmental Protection Agency standard that arsenic at any level below 10 parts per billion is generally safe. Consumer Reports decided to halve that standard to 5 parts per billion. Based on what? Was that the threshold at which it could find those worrisome levels?

The FDA just about called the Consumer Reports researchers non-scientists when its deputy commissioner commented on the Consumer Reports’ study, “It is critical to not get ahead of the science. The FDA’s ongoing data collection and other assessments will give us a solid scientific basis for determining what action levels and/or other steps are needed to reduce exposure to arsenic in rice and rice products.”

The USA Rice Federation rightly pointed out that rice is safe because nobody has gotten sick from eating it, which went right over the heads of almost everyone reporting on the issue.

Consumer Reports could have given balance to the study by considering the nutritional value of rice and backed off making recommendations until it knew more about what constituted dangerous levels. The national news media could have at least put up a fight. Instead, they rolled over. Between balance and the boogeyman, both chose the boogeyman.

As for me, pass the rice bowl please. I think I will have a second helping.



Discuss this Blog Entry 3

MFJ (not verified)
on Sep 24, 2012

Thanks for writing some sense in your article. I come from a 5th generation family of rice eaters in south Louisiana. No one in my family has ever been sick or has had bladder or lung cancer! We eat rice at least twice a day. The life expectancy has risen in our family to an average of 85 years over the last two generations. I think Consumer Reports just cried "Fire" in a theater somewhere to get some attention to sell magazines. I have lost all respect for them. I will not take anything they say seriously as I was accustomed to doing before they published this article.

Anonymous (not verified)
on Sep 24, 2012

Wow, how does a corporate patsy such as yourself sleep at night?

Johnny Saichuk (not verified)
on Sep 25, 2012

Thanks for writing an article using common sense a character missing from much of today's world. I rank this one among other hoaxes perpetrated on the Americn public such as Alar and asbestos. If they decide to test more food items pretty soon there will not be anything left to eat based on their recommendations.

Please or Register to post comments.

What's Farm Press Blog?

The Farm Press Daily Blog

Connect With Us

Blog Archive
Continuing Education
Potassium nitrate has a positive effect in controlling plant pests and diseases when applied...
This online CE course details sound mechanical irrigation design and management practices to...