Ventria Bioscience response
Mar 22, 2005 12:32 PM
Following weeks of
failed attempts to set up a live interview, at Ventria’s request, Delta Farm Press agreed to offer a
written list of questions. Below, are DFP’s
questions and answers provided by Scott Deeter, Ventria CEO. They are presented
unabridged.
Before getting to the bulk of the
questions, please describe the benefits (both pharmaceutically and financially)
Ventria’s pharm-rice will provide to consumers.
“Ventria is producing
two proteins, Lactoferrin and Lysozyme. Both of these proteins are found in
tears, saliva, bronchial fluids and as important components in mother’s milk.
These proteins have antimicrobial, anti-inflammatory and iron binding
properties. Ventria is currently developing an Oral Rehydration Solution
including lactoferrin and lysozyme to manage diarrhea and dehydration. Ventria
believes that the addition of these two proteins to an Oral Rehydration
Solution will provide improved management and intestinal protection, not just
rehydration of the child. According to the World Health Organization, on a
worldwide basis 1.3 million children under the age of 5 die of acute diarrhea
worldwide. Several other health products utilizing Lactoferrin and/or Lysozyme
are in development at Ventria.
“Ventria utilizes
rice and barley to produce these therapeutic proteins and estimates the cost
would increase by more than thirty times to produce the same proteins using
other systems of production. Plant-made pharmaceuticals have the potential to
provide patients with the benefit of greater access to necessary medicines.”
1. Can Ventria guarantee that its
pharm-rice (or its pollen) won’t somehow find its way into neighboring
(conventional) rice fields?
“Ventria utilizes a
closed system of production that includes self-pollinating plants to produce
plant-made pharmaceuticals. Self-pollinating plants contain the male and female
reproduction system within the same plant and do not require wind or insects
for pollination and reproduction. This significantly reduces the risk from
cross-pollination. Also, Ventria produces its product in the seed of rice only
during the last month of the growing phase of the plant. Thus, the product is
not present in the leaf, stems, or root material.
“In addition, Ventria
is completely committed to sound stewardship practices and has passed every
USDA inspection for the past six years including eight inspections in 2004.
Ventria maintains chain of custody for all of its plant-made pharmaceutical
crops and we have a very stringent production protocol to maintain quality and
containment.
“In order to maintain
product quality and as part of Ventria’s commitment to sound stewardship,
Ventria has instituted the following production practices:
·
Ventria’s field
production will be grown in areas that are separated from commercial rice production
by considerable distance.
·
Ventria’s products
are manufactured within the seed of self-pollinating rice or barley, which are
not wind or insect pollinated plants;
·
Ventria’s field
production, storage, grinding and transportation equipment is dedicated only to
Ventria’s use and is not used for any commodity rice or barley production.
·
Ventria’s
collaborators and field production personnel receive extensive training related
to regulatory requirements and Ventria’s standard operating procedures.
“Ventria monitors its
production practices for compliance and performs frequent audits of its
operations. Ventria is also inspected numerous times by USDA for permit
compliance. As you know, this ‘closed’ system is nothing like the ‘open’
systems used today for food production.”
1-A. If so, is Ventria’s
guarantee backed by anything more than words?
“Please see above.”
1-B. If not, who will pay any
affected Delta rice farmers for lost income? Will Ventria make up for any such
losses?
“Please see response
to question 1. We have very stringent USDA regulations and standard operating
procedures in place to maintain chain of custody for our rice.”
1-C. Has Ventria looked into the
possibility of taking out an insurance policy for those farmers if
contamination occurred?
“Please see above
response.”
2. If allowed, how much Ventria
pharm-rice will be grown this year (acres)? How much is planned for next year?
Is there an acreage plan for the years after?
“Ventria has
submitted its 2005 production permit application to the United States
Department of Agriculture (USDA) for 200 acres. The 2005 permits would
authorize production in Cape Girardeau, Scott and Mississippi counties in
Missouri. Ventria has received approval from the USDA and has produced its
products every year since 1999.
“Acreage requirements
beyond 2005 are difficult to predict, it will depend primarily on Ventria’s
business plan and the success of our products in meeting the health needs of
our customers.”
2-A. How far from “conventional”
rice fields is/are Ventria’s Bootheel field(s) being grown?
“Ventria’s field site
is located in an area that does not grow rice today. Rather, the surrounding
fields are planted to corn and soybeans. The nearest rice field is 4 miles away
and there is no rice to the North, East or West of the proposed growing area.”
3. Viable seed are often passed
through birds’ digestive systems. There have been claims that Ventria’s
pharm-rice will more easily break down in birds’ guts. Does this eliminate the
chance that birds (ducks or otherwise) will disperse this seed in neighboring
rice fields?
“There are two studies that look at the issue of the
viability of grain in waterfowl digestive systems. The results of both studies
show that rice is highly digestible by waterfowl and that no viable rice passes
through the digestive system of ducks or geese. Rice is easily digested by
birds, unlike weed seeds that have a hard seed coat. In fact, it is suggested
that attracting birds to a field containing red rice is a viable weed
management practice because the birds effectively digest the red rice and
render it non-viable. Red rice has an even harder seed coat than Ventria’s rice
variety, so there is less likelihood of birds transporting rice in this manner.
Please see the following papers for more information:
“Seed Distribution By Waterfowl In Southwestern Louisiana”
J. Wildlife Management 42(3) 1978 598-605Powers, K.D., R.E. Nobel, R. H.
Chabreck
“Reduction of Red Rice Grain in Rice Fields by Winter
Feeding of Ducks” Arkansas Farm Research 29(4) 1980 pg. 3 Smith, R.J. Jr. and
J.D. Sullivan
3-A. How does Ventria propose to
keep its pharm-rice from dispersing to neighboring rice fields through
flooding?
“Ventria will have a
levee and a 50 foot fallow area around its field to keep all water in the
field. All of the water that is removed from Ventria’s field will be pumped
into a sediment pond. The water will be pumped out of the sediment pond through
a screen that will catch any rice seeds that are present in the water.”
3-B. How does Ventria propose to
keep its pharm-rice from dispersing to neighboring rice fields through pollen
carried on the wind?
“Rice is a self
pollinated plant and the life of its pollen is only a few minutes. That means
that rice has both male and female organs contained within the same plant,
rather than relying on insects or wind to carry pollen for reproduction. One
recent paper addressing the many studies on rice self-pollination is:
“Gene Flow Between
Red Rice and Herbicide-Resistant Rice: Implications for Weed Management” Weed
Technology, 2003, Volume 17:627-645.
“For these reasons,
many research studies determined that 10 feet was an adequate distance between
rice seed fields to maintain purity of Foundation Seed (highest purity
standards). More recent studies have shown that outcrossing in even adjacent
plants is unlikely. No studies have shown outcrossing beyond 30 feet. Since
Ventria utilizes a 50 foot fallow area and a distance of more than 4 miles to
another rice field, redundant safeguards are in place to prevent an event as
you described.”
3-C. How does Ventria propose to
keep its pharm-rice from dispersing to neighboring rice fields through pollen
carried by insects?
“As stated in the
previous answer rice is self-pollinating and does not rely on insects for pollination.”
3-D. How does Ventria propose to
keep its pharm-rice from dispersing to neighboring rice fields through movement
of equipment or human error?
“Ventria owns its own
field production, storage, transportation and milling equipment, which is
dedicated to Ventria’s production. In Ventria’s ‘closed’ system of production
viable seed does not leave the farm. It is processed into a non-viable powder
before shipment.
“It is important to
clarify that Ventria maintains ownership and chain of custody of the rice or
barley throughout the entire production process from the field to the purified
protein.”
4. Why can’t Ventria grow its
pharm-rice in indoor facilities?
“One of the distinct
advantages that plant made pharmaceuticals have is the ability to scale-up and
produce large quantities of pharmaceuticals in an affordable system. Working
with the United States Department of Agriculture, Ventria has developed a
system to safely produce these therapeutic proteins and maintain a sound
stewardship philosophy.”
5. Why relocate to a state where
rice is already grown? Could Ventria not find a suitable location – perhaps to
grow its pharm-rice under pivot – further away from major rice producers in the
Delta?
“During 2004, Ventria
decided to evaluate its options for commercial production going forward and was
heavily recruited by six states in addition to Missouri. Ventria’s relocation
to Missouri would not have been possible without the leadership and vision of
Dean Hubbard (President of NWMSU), Mel Booth (former President of MedImmune,
Human Genome Sciences and NWMSU alumnus), Senator David Klindt, Representative
Brad Lager, Terry Maglich, Missouri Department of Economic Development, the
Missouri Department of Agriculture and Lee Langerock, Nodaway County Economic Development.
“Ventria selected
Missouri for the following reasons:
1) the establishment of the Center of Excellence in Plant-made
Pharmaceuticals by Northwest Missouri State University provided the necessary
infrastructure for Ventria to commercialize its products;
2) the economics of field production in Missouri and the high
quality land and water resources were attractive compared to Ventria’s
alternatives, especially California;
3) the capabilities and expertise of Missouri’s growers,
especially their experience with biotechnology-based crops such as soybeans and
maize;
4) The State of Missouri is a leader in the development and
commercialization of biotechnology from St. Louis (Danforth Plant Science
Center, Botanical Gardens, and Washington University) to Columbia (University
of Missouri) to Maryville (NWMSU) to Kansas City (Stowers Biomedical Research
Institute, KU Med Center), there are many institutions in the region that
provide the critical mass of talented people that make knowledge-based
businesses like biotechnology successful.”
6. Why is Ventria growing its
pharm-rice in the Bootheel, when it’s headquartered at Northwest Missouri State
hundreds of miles away?
“Ventria will produce
in Scott County and in Northwest Missouri this year and will process at the field
production location into a powder. This powder serves as the feedstock to an
extraction process that will be based at Northwest Missouri State Univeristy’s
campus in Maryville, Mo. We need to have a location that provides both
efficient field production and the infrastructure for extraction, which is why
we are producing in both locations.”
7. Could Ventria’s pharm-rice
traits be passed to red rice or other weeds?
“Ventria will keep
its field free of red rice (as describe in section 13e of the permit application)
by manual rouging and/or chemical application. Ventria’s present seed stock
(developed in California) is also red-rice free.”
8. Is Ventria – or its attorneys
– prepared/preparing for the possibility of a legal injunction against the
planting of its pharm-rice?
“No.”
9. Why did Ventria decide to
leave California?
“Ventria received
approval from the California Rice Commission, the California Department of Food
and Agriculture and the USDA to grow plant-made pharmaceutical rice in
California. In 2004 and in 2003 Ventria grew its rice in California and its
barley in Iowa.
“See above for the
reasons we selected Missouri over other states that recruited Ventria.”
10. Did Ventria approach someone
in Missouri about re-locating there or did someone from Missouri contact
Ventria? Either way, when was the move first discussed?
“Officials from
Missouri contacted Ventria.”
10-A. Who was (were) Ventria’s
first contact(s) when contemplating the move to Missouri?
“Several contacts
were made with officials from Northwest Missouri State University, Missouri
Department of Economic Development, Missouri Department of Agriculture,
University of Missouri at Columbia, legislators, farmers and leaders within the
research institutions within the State of Missouri.”
10-B. Was Ventria offered
financial incentives by the state of Missouri to relocate?
“The reasons for
Ventria’s decision to relocate are listed in question 9.”
10-C. Did Ventria have any
responsibility to inform Bootheel rice growers that it would be moving into the
area?
“Before making the
decision to relocate to Missouri, Ventria met with a number of local
representatives to discuss its plans to grow and with their help, Ventria
selected an area that does not have rice production today.”
10-D. Was the resistance – mostly
for market-loss fears – by many Delta rice growers to Ventria’s plans in the
Bootheel a surprise or was the company expecting it?
“First, many growers
are quite positive and have been influential in Ventria’s plans to grow in
Missouri. Second, Ventria described its plans to growers in Southeast Missouri
during a recent meeting in Dexter, Mo. This meeting provided an opportunity to
share our plans with growers and to address concerns. As we heard in this
meeting, there are many growers that are supportive of the opportunity that
plant-made pharmaceuticals offer to bring opportunities for rural development
and Missouri agriculture.”
11. In light of the federal
government’s stated “zero tolerance” standard for plant-made pharmaceuticals in
food, how does Ventria view Delta rice growers’ concerns about the potential of
pharm-rice contamination ruining the market for their crops?
“This is an issue
that is the basis of the USDA regulatory process and has been addressed with
the above protocol, which has been reviewed by USDA.”
12. Is Ventria doing anything to
open foreign markets in case their pharm-rice does contaminate neighboring
crops?
“Please see above
comments.”







